. are the messages that are given to a web browser or server that is created from the user's historical data. The message contains user data retrieved from memory and can influence how we use the internet based on what we are interested in or have already browsed.
Most sites use this information to improve the user's functionality and to track the performance of their own websites so they can continue to improve the user experience, but that's the way minority that uses this information dishonestly. I convinced the ICO to introduce this new law.
The necessary cookies are those that remember login information or basket details when shopping online. Anything that simply remembers your search habits or the websites you have visited is now prohibited.
What does it mean for websites? Is it a good thing or a bad thing? Well, for most sites in the EU, this actually means that they are breaking the law and could be considered illegal.
Do not threaten, as you did until May 2012, either to get rid of cookies associated with your site or create warnings for your users and the option to disable them. But for many web site owners, that's the problem and this also represents an inconvenient inconvenience for internet users because in most cases this will mean the excessive use of pop-up.
Of course, the other way around the problems caused by the new legislation on cookies is simply to delete them all. But this will also harm the user experience, because the functionality of the website is something that will suffer particularly.
What will happen if you ignore the new law?
The ICO has not yet established the law enforcement is still in place for those who do not comply with the new law but who have alluded to pecuniary civil penalties. These will not be enforced until May 2012, largely because even the ICO can see that making the changes necessary to comply with the law will have difficulties.
they did, it is that it clearly contradicts the issue that they are trying to thwart by introducing the law. It is written in a way that assumes that the person who enters his site knows what a cookie is and what he does. The purpose of the law is to help protect those who do not know what a cookie is or what does, effectively by their own legislation their site does not comply.
developer what they think of the law and you can cover your ears when they give their honest opinion. Yes, protecting people's privacy is certainly an issue that needs to be addressed, but introducing this law is too ambitious.
To put things in perspective, if a window cleaner stole the properties he was working on. You would not then go out and ban all window cleaners or make sure that they get signed release slips whenever the time to clean your windows. It would slow down their work and bother you as an owner. You would rather punish those who break the law.